Tags
Bahia/Brazil, Brazilian poet Carlos Machado, Poem “Certo” (Certainty) by Carlos Machado, Poetry collection Pássaro de Vidro by Carlos Machado, São Paulo/Brazil, The uncertainty of life
My Poetry Corner February 2020 features the poem “Certainty” (Certo) from the poetry collection Glass Bird (Pássaro de Vidro) by Carlos Machado, a Brazilian poet and journalist. Born in 1951 in Muritiba, Bahia, Northeast Brazil, Machado earned his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering at the Federal University of Bahia. He studied journalism at the Faculty of Cásper Libero in São Paulo, where he lives since 1980. He is the creator and editor of the fortnightly bulletin, poesia.net, dedicated mainly to the promotion of contemporary Brazilian poets.
Machado’s debut poetry collection, Glass Bird (Pássaro de Vidro), published in São Paulo in 2006, was well received by literary critics. From the first verse of his poem “Anatomies,” from the same collection, I glean that the glass bird reveals both faces of the human character: on one side, our obscure dreams and aspirations; on the other side, the things with which we surround ourselves.
anatomy of things
to strip bare
the glass bird
and see on its side
hidden from view
the other side
of its image
In his poem, “Things” (As Coisas), from his collection Blunt Scissors (Tesoura Cega, 2015), Machado looks at the things we accumulate to define who we are as individuals within society. Things have no say in our lives, the poet observes. They don’t have desires or power. Regardless of the value we bestow on them, they are all equal – all indifferent to humanity’s fate.
Things don’t have guilt.
They are only witnesses
of our comedies.
Things don’t embrace causes.
It is useless to accuse them
of any inclination,
loyalty or felony.
I was struck by Machado’s featured poem, “Certainty.” In these times of our planet’s climate and ecological crises, the poem throws light on what may be hampering our ability to grapple with real threats to our survival as a species. In holding on to our belief that everything will work out for the better, we risk failing to see that there are no certainties in our lives.
things do not work out
never worked out
were never made to work out
We, the poet observes, are the ones who have sought to create an alternate reality in which all things are aligned and symmetrical.
and even invent perfect gods
constructed in the image
and likeness of our dreams
Our gods, we reckon, don’t wish to see us suffer, and will rescue us when our world collapses around us.
Things do not work out
it is we who patch the fabric
fill the tooth
repair the border on the map
Machado’s comment about borders is so apt for Americans obsessed with building a wall on our southern border with Mexico. We believe that the border will somehow restore certainty to our disrupted and insecure lives. If only!
To read the complete featured poem in English and its original Portuguese, and to learn more about the work of Carlos Machado, go to my Poetry Corner February 2020.
🌹👏
LikeLiked by 2 people
A fascinating poet
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree, Derrick. I’m looking forward to reading more of his work.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for this post on Antonio Machado. Good to remember him from my Brazilian literature class days. 🙂 I just saw a post on Good Black News about the first Black director of a college in the UK, and she’s from Guyana. You’ve likely already heard…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Machado is a common name in the Brazilian literary world. My featured poet is Carlos Machado who is not as well known as Antonio Machado.
Who is the Guyanese-born director of the college in the UK that you refer to?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the correction. Here’s the news about the UK: “Baroness Valerie Amos has been appointed master of University College at Oxford University”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the info. I’ve read about her. Quite a lady!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: “Certainty” by Brazilian Poet Carlos Machado – by Rosaliene Bacchus | Guyanese Online
I was especially struck by his commentary on “things.” George Carlin had a humorous take on the “stuff” we carry around. We spend so much time “getting and spending,” as Wordsworth wrote. Our danger in valuing thing so highly is that they will mock us if we do not put effort into loftier considerations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was, too, Dr. Stein. I first considered featuring Machado’s poem, “Things,” but thought that “Certainty” was more relevant to our current situation as a species. Machado has a unique vision of human existence that we often take for granted. We never question the validity of our way of life. We simply accept things the way they are.
LikeLike
It is good to question. That includes questioning God. I don’t think God wants to see us suffer, but, like a wise parent, God may very well allow us to experience the natural consequences of our actions or inactions rather than bailing us out, especially after all the warning signs offered by weather, fires, and science.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Joanna, I think every “believer” (or non for that matter) has created a god in her/his own image, whose character matches what that person believes of philosophy and morality. But if you speak of “THE” God, as in Yahweh of the OT, then consider this:
Ge. 3:16 To the woman he said, “I will greatly increase your pains in
childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your
desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”
Ge. 3:17 To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate
from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not
eat of it,’ “Cursed is the ground because of you; through
painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life.
Ge. 3:18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat
the plants of the field.
Ge. 3:19 By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you
return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust
you are and to dust you will return.”
Do you still think “THE” God does not want people, or whatever else, to suffer? I was raised in Catholicism and it taught that pain and suffering were the path to salvation if accepted in humility and in God’s name. Eventually believers are going to have to explain the “how” of God’s supposed love or accept that their God is a psychopath. On another blog someone said that Christians cannot decide between the God of Plato or the God of Jesus. My response is, Christians have kept the God of Plato for themselves and inflicted the Old Testament monster on the rest of the world, thus explaining the Christian dichotomy of love as a belief system.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sha’Tara, as a woman, I’ve always had a problem with the God of wrath of the Old Testament. Jesus, on the other hand, must’ve been formed from the rib of the woman.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, Rosaliene (oops, only one “n”!) I remember some home Christian meetings in which we discussed the problem of the dual character of Jesus. Jesus the “lamb of God,” the compassionate who could shed real human tears over Jerusalem knowing what was coming down and also knowing how the people could have healed themselves from their pain and sorrow if they had accepted his message of compassion – and the subsequent re-name to an ancient Greek deity: Christ. We would talk about how it would feel to think of ourselves as Jesuans, it had so much more gentleness even in just the name. If only Jesus could have been a woman… sigh!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t believe everything in the old testament. I do like your idea of “Jesuans.” Sometimes I refer to myself as a “follower of Jesus,” but I’m certainly not a perfect follower.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hah, Joanna (two “n’s”!!!) I refer to myself as a failed Christian. I could not honestly live up to the demands of Jesus in the synoptics. If you can’t do the job, I said to myself, have the decency and courage to admit it and quit, make room for someone else to try. The alternative was to do the church thing where “believers” get together to listen to bromides, sing childish or utterly outdated songs, put up with hellish industrial strength rock and roll and congratulate one-another on being in “fellowship” just for showing up to a meeting. Then gather at a favourite restaurant to discuss business deals, brag about various successes and argue about the church board’s decision to buy a much larger piece of real estate to put that new bigger, if not mega, church. Yeah, I still have my memories of church life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sorry your church life memories were negative and understand some of that. I’ve always been uncomfortable with church ? jargon, especially the term, “believers,” implying there are “non-believers.” Most people believe in something. It’s okay if all our beliefs don’t fit neatly into a particular box. I guess that’s why I go to a smallish Episcopal church. It’s not perfect, but at least there’s some flexibility and an appreciation for reason and exploration.
LikeLiked by 2 people
JoAnna, I couldn’t agree more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love this — Machado’s poetry feels very haiku, stripped to the essentials, giving us room to reflect.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, Kim. He does have a way of stripping poetry to the essentials. So glad that you can also appreciate his work 🙂
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing!!.. “There are some people who live in a dream world, and there are some who face reality; and then there are those who turn one into the other.” –( Douglas H. Everett)… 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dutch, I love that quote from Everett 🙂
LikeLike
Beautiful beautiful thoughts you have shared here. Love the intimacy. Thank you for your words and your incredible reading of his words. ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shayleene, how wonderful that you, too, appreciate the beauty of Machado’s poetry! Thanks for dropping by 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
❤
LikeLiked by 1 person