Tags
Climate activist Greta Thunberg, Divesting from fossil fuels, Doomsday Clock/Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Global climate emergency, Global Risks Report 2020, Increased threat of nuclear war, Michael T Klare, U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, World Economic Forum 2020 in Davos
On Thursday, January 23, 2020, our atomic scientists advanced the Doomsday Clock another twenty seconds, bringing the fate of humanity to a hundred seconds to midnight. For those who don’t know, midnight signifies humanity’s self-annihilation with its nuclear arsenal. The guns that Americans cling to, like a toddler clings to his teddy bear, would be rendered useless in the face of a nuclear threat. To learn more, read the full statement issued by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
In his article “Twin Threats,” published in The Nation magazine (issue dated 01/27/2020), Michael T. Klare argues:
“All things being equal, rising temperatures will increase the likelihood of nuclear war, largely because climate change will heighten the risk of social stress, the decay of nation-states, and armed violence in general…”
Of special concern are India, Pakistan, and China—all well-armed with nuclear weapons of mass destruction—that will face conflicts over dwindling water supplies. Pakistan and western India share the same Indus River system. Likewise, eastern India and western China both depend upon the Brahmaputra River for their water needs. Unlike oil, water is essential for human survival.
While the American government continues to publicly disavow our global climate emergency, Klare notes that our “nation’s senior military leaders recognize that climate disruption is already underway, and they are planning extraordinary measures to prevent it from spiraling into nuclear war.”
On Friday, January 24, at the 2020 World Economic Forum in Davos, during a panel discussion about the impact of climate change on the global economy, U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was quick to say: “Let’s call it an environmental issue and not climate change.” What’s more, he argued, experts are overestimating its monetary impact.
During a press briefing the day before, Mnuchin dismissed climate activist Greta Thunberg’s call for divestment from fossil fuel companies. He told Yahoo Finance: “After she goes and studies economics in college, she can come back and explain that to us.” What can Greta and the rest of us economic neophytes learn from the experts?
On January 15, prior to its event in Davos, the World Economic Forum released The Global Risks Report 2020 in London, UK. Bear in mind that this report, produced in partnership with Marsh & McLennan and the Zurich Insurance Group, deals with financial risks for transnational corporations and national and the global economies.
Over 750 global experts and decision-makers were asked to rank their biggest concerns in terms of likelihood and impact. For the first time in the survey’s ten-year outlook, the top five global risks in terms of likelihood are all environmental. In concise terms, these risks are:
1. Extreme weather
2. Climate Action failure
3. Natural disasters
4. Biodiversity loss
5. Human-made environmental disasters
The political landscape is polarized, sea levels are rising and climate fires are burning. This is the year when world leaders must work with all sectors of society to repair and reinvigorate our systems of cooperation, not just for short-term benefit but for tackling our deep-rooted risks.
~ Borge Brende, President of the World Economic ForumBiologically diverse ecosystems capture vast amounts of carbon and provide massive economic benefits that are estimated at $33 trillion per year – the equivalent to the GDP of the US and China combined. It’s critical that companies and policy-makers move faster to transition to a low carbon economy and more sustainable business models. We are already seeing companies destroyed by failing to align their strategies to shifts in policy and customer preferences. Transitionary risks are real, and everyone must play their part to mitigate them. It’s not just an economic imperative, it is simply the right thing to do.
~ Peter Giger, Group Chief Risk Officer of the Zurich Insurance Group
I’m no economic expert. I know only that the soulless corporate personhood has devised ways to thrive on the chaos and detritus of human calamity. To the billionaire-class and those who aspire to join them, gathered recently at the World Economic Forum, I say: Your self-enrichment economic system is the Number One risk to humanity’s continued existence on Planet Earth. While you continue to amass unimaginable wealth, the explosive inequality among the masses of real people worldwide just requires a climate-induced drought and famine in a nuclear-armed nation for ignition.
When the Doomsday Clock strikes midnight, money markets and a nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) will lose their value and meaning for any surviving remnant of our species.
The World Economic Forum is deserving of great criticism, but kudos to them for releasing this report.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Robert, I believe that they know their time of endless profits is running out. It’s the endgame. Now they’ve got to get everyone (their elite club) on board to stop their runaway train.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Kudos indeed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The super wealthy of course have their plans to leave this planet and go start again on another planet…… because, you know planets are expendable……..
There’s none so blind as those who refuse to see beyond the zeros in their bank accounts. And that applies to those who believe in them too.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Pauline, I’ve come to the same conclusion. They’ve probably used some of their billions to book a seat on one of Elon Musk’s spaceships to the Mars colony already in the works.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What good is an economy to dead people? Great post Rosaliene and deeply disturbing.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Not just dead people, Kathryn, an entire civilization. Thanks for reading 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes…excellent post. The future looks foreboding
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks very much, Mary. Our future is bleak. Greta Thunberg and all our world’s youth have just cause for alarm.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said, these are crazy times.. I’ve spent the last month breathing in endless bushfire smoke blowing into melbourne. Feels like our whole east coast went up in flames.. our government has it’s head in the sand also.. absolutely unbelievable.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rachael, the extent of the region under fire was also absolutely unbelievable to me, following the news from a distance. The droughts, the fires, the floods, the super-storms, and more will continue to worsen in the years ahead.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Now we are being warned about an influx of deadly spiders coming indoors! Weird weather conditions means there might be a lot! lucky I’m not phobic..https://7news.com.au/news/animals/australian-reptile-park-issues-warning-as-influx-of-deadly-funnel-web-spider-expected-c-659324
LikeLiked by 1 person
Endless greed from just a handful of people will do us all in sooner than later. Sad.
LikeLiked by 3 people
What’s also sad, Kreb, is that they appear to be blinded by their endless greed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sad. Facts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your penultimate paragraph is so pertinent
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for reading, Derrick. I keep hoping that our billionaire-class would wake up to their folly, but they continue to disappoint.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’ll be how they got to be billionaires.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Doomsday Clock: A Hundred Seconds to Midnight – by Rosaliene Bacchus | Guyanese Online
Chilling, Rosaliene.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hi Rosaliene …. thanks for posting this.
The statement from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists is a confirmation from credible experts indeed…. this is a very serious moment of earths history and humanity. In an odd sort of way I found it comforting development as the statement (and your reporting it) makes me not feel so alone in our realizing the urgency. Maybe I’m not so crazy to feel what I feel, after all!
Yesterday i listened to a 30 minute up-to-date interview with Nom Chomsky about the state of the world, especially in regards to the US…. And he brought up these exact two threats you explain here.The nuclear threat in conjunction with the climate crises. Chomsky connects all the dots in a detailed manner that illustrate what has brought us to this brink… especially recent events. It’s amazing that at 91 he’s still teaching and researching and reporting as he is. The reporter asks what keeps him going…. he answered… “what else can I do?”
As it goes, then last night I awoke at 4.30 Am (again)… I was having a dream (nightmare rather) of being in the midst of a nuclear holocaust.
The nuclear threat has sort of come to the fore of my mind the past few months or so. More so, especially after the terrible violence of the US and Iran from a few weeks ago. Well, I couldn’t go back to sleep (well I did later for an hour or so) and here I am now baring my soul about the tensions I feel.
Thanks for your continued solidarity, your bearing witness and sharing your knowledge and perspective about the struggle and suffering. Today this helps move on with my day, without forgetting… and trying to process it all with thoughtful consideration on how to move forward. For one thing, I’m going out doors in a few minutes… that too will help.
In peace, Bruce
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bruce, thanks for dropping by and sharing your concerns. I also take comfort in knowing that our atomic scientists are closely watching developments. Now that the minority corporate elite have succeeded in capturing the reins of the nuclear-armed American government, they are on a rampage to undo all the environmental protections put in place over recent decades. They believe that our technological advances will temper the wrath of Mother Nature.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yea … the technical imperative seems to by that of destroying…. the Great Unraveling as Joanna Macy Calls… or hopefully, the Great Turning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
RE: Davos. I remain quite skeptical of the World Economic Forum’s motives for raising these environmental issues at this junction. Especially as they are simultaneously promoting the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”: https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/davos-insights.html
What the world doesn’t need now is industrial capitalism on steroids. In my view, the 4th industrial revolution is promoting the same old capitalist extraction and exploitation based on renewable technology rather than fossil fuels. To solve the current climate and nuclear crisis, we residents of the industrialized world need to be supported in reducing our energy usage and mindless material consumption.
Setting up new industries to recklessly exploit Third World countries for their lithium, cobalt, coltran and other rare earth minerals will only worsen the global environmental (and refugee) crisis – not improve it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Dr. Bramhall, thanks for sharing the link to the Deloitte’s report on “The Fourth Industrial Revolution.” It’s incredible how the corporate elite simply changes the narrative to suit the times and continues to plow forward with the same failed systems.
LikeLike
Why should they not continue with their “madness” Rosaliene? It has NEVER failed for them. They are predators and they are functioning according to their nature. If the so-called “99%” can’t, or won’t, wake up to reality, the predators will be the last to die. Unless conditions force massive bloody revolutions world-wide, in which case the fattened predators likely will be slaughtered. And then? Then an even more aggressive group of young predators will replace the old and the game will go on… as long as there’s some sort of sustenance to be drawn from the planet and those who exist upon it can continue to be enslaved. This is Earth after all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing, Roseliene… It is disheartening and disastrous that our nation’s leaders turn a blind eye to truth.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It sure is, Bette.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for sharing!!.. I do agree the environment will have a huge impact, fueled by greed ( those who will resist change because it will cost them money).. I also believe another threat is the closed minded ideologies, especially in the area of religion/beliefs…
“There is none so blind that will not see” (Ray Stevens)…
LikeLiked by 2 people
So true, Dutch.
LikeLike
I wish I could argue against this international blindness on the part of those governments and companies only interested in money. I can’t.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I can’t either, Dr. Stein.
LikeLike
Things are looking very bleak, aren’t they? I still hope against all evidence that the tide will turn soon, but the clock is truly ticking.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We live in dark times, Sean. Only we the people will turn the tide.
LikeLike
Sometimes I just want to head for the hills and hide out. But more often, I think about revolution. Usually the more civil kind. Polarization is not what most humans want. We must not let the toxic media and political forces continue to polarize us. If we the people can figure out how to work together, there may still be hope for us.
LikeLiked by 2 people
JoAnna, we can and must figure out how to work together. I see it as our only way forward.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. That is the way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on From 1 Blogger 2 Another.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am interested to know how Michael Bloomberg would deal with the climate crisis of elected.
LikeLiked by 2 people
According to his official website, here’s what Bloomberg has to say about his proposed policies on climate change:
Whether President Trump acknowledges it or not, climate change poses the greatest threat of our time – not just to the environment, but to public health, the economy, and society. If we don’t act now, we will face more frequent extreme weather events that will displace coastal communities, devastate farms and businesses, and spread disease.
Mike will restore American leadership in the fight against climate change by slashing U.S. carbon emissions and investing in clean-energy projects that not only minimize rising temperatures, but also lead to new jobs, cleaner air and water, cheaper power, more transportation options, and less congested roads.
https://www.mikebloomberg.com/policies/climate-change
LikeLike