Tags
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), ExxonMobil, Guyana-ExxonMobil Profit Sharing Agreement (PSA), Guyana’s oil and natural gas development, Oil and natural gas industry, Petroleum (Exploration & Production) Act, Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF), US Energy Governance & Capacity Initiative
ExxonMobil Country Manager Rod Henson receives Production License
from Minister of Natural Resources Raphael Trotman
Georgetown – Guyana – June 15, 2017
Photo Credit: Guyana Ministry of Natural Resources
On June 15, 2017, Guyana tied the knot with ExxonMobil with the signing of a production license for the extraction of oil and natural gas, located offshore the Caribbean/South American nation with a population of 800,000 people. With this license, together with the Environmental Permit granted on June 1st, ExxonMobil will proceed with the Liza Phase 1 development. Located 120 miles offshore in an area known as the Stabroek Block, the Liza field development includes a subsea production system and a floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel designed to produce up to 120,000 barrels of oil per day. Exxon and its partners plan to begin production by 2020.
ExxonMobil’s press release on June 16th states: “Phase 1 is expected to cost just over $4.4 billion, which includes a lease capitalization cost of approximately $1.2 billion for the FPSO facility, and will develop approximately 450 million barrels of oil.
It is a marriage of unequal partners. ExxonMobil’s profit margin in 2016 is more than twice that of Guyana’s GDP of US$3.5 billion for the same year. With the assistance of local and foreign experts in the industry, the Guyana government has reviewed the Production Sharing Agreement (PSA), signed in 1999 when exploration began under the former leftist Guyana government.
Full disclosure of the ExxonMobil PSA is not available to the public. Guyana’s Minister of Natural Resources Raphael Trotman indicated that full disclosure is not within the national interest at this time. Prime Minister Moses Nagamootoo was more explicit, citing the century-old unresolved border dispute between Guyana and Venezuela as a security risk. [The Stabroek Block is located in the disputed territory.] Reaffirming the Prime Minister’s stance, Minister of State Joseph Harmon added that a “legal consideration” in the Petroleum (Exploration & Production) Act (1998) also prevents full disclosure.
Based on information released by the Minister of Natural Resources, Guyana will receive a royalty of two percent on gross earnings. When production begins in 2020, 75 percent of total revenues will go to ExxonMobil for its investment in exploration and preparation for production—estimated at US$5 billion. The remaining 25 percent will be shared 50-50 between ExxonMobil and Guyana.
To avoid the “resource curse” that occurs with the mismanagement of oil revenues, Minister of Finance Winston Jordan has announced the preparation of a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF). The draft includes input from the Commonwealth Secretariat, the World Bank, and other international agencies. With an effective SWF in place, the country expects to obtain long-term investment and financial benefits from its oil, gas, and mineral resources.
Mismanagement of its petrodollars is not the only challenge Guyana faces. The racially-divisive, developing country has a history of corruption. To tackle this issue, the Guyana Oil & Gas Association partnered with the Caribbean Institute of Forensic Accounting and the African Business Roundtable (South Africa) to host a two-day symposium on July 5-6th in the capital, Georgetown, on “Public Corruption and the Curse of Oil: Lessons from Developing Countries.”
Vicky McPherson, one of the panelists, noted: “You can have all of the laws and regulations in place, but if you don’t have the leadership and the personal conviction, quite frankly, to not steal from the public coffers, none of this matters.”
In yet another effort to achieve transparency in the industry, the Ministry of Natural Resources obtained assistance from The Carter Center to support Guyana’s bid to join the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI): an international standard for the good governance of revenues derived from oil, gas, mining, and other natural resources.
More danger lurks with this marriage of unequal partners. Who will monitor and regulate the mammoth?
On April 5, 2017, Guyana’s Attorney General and Minister of Legal Affairs Basil Williams met with the American team for Energy Governance and Capacity Initiative (EGCI), a program of the Bureau of Energy Resources of the US Department of State. According to the press release from Guyana’s Department of Public Information (DPI), the American team confirmed their commitment “to building infrastructural and institutional databases as well as to provide technical assistance to countries that are in the early stages of developing an oil and gas industry.” Considering that their boss, the US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, is the former CEO of ExxonMobil, Guyana should be concerned about likely future conflicts of interest.
The oil and natural gas market also faces new risks with the global transition to renewable energy. In 2016, as the price of wind and solar power continued to fall, renewable energy capacity has grown worldwide. According to a new report in the Energy Watch Group Newsletter June 2017, ExxonMobil and the other four major oil companies “risk spending more than a third of their budgets by 2025 on oil and gas projects that will not be feasible if international climate targets are to be met.”
This risk has not gone unnoticed among ExxonMobil’s shareholders. At the end of May, 62 percent of them voted in favor of more open and detailed analyses of risks posed by climate change policies. Meanwhile in Guyana at an oil and gas seminar, the Minister of Natural Resources assured local participants that the discovery of oil and natural gas will not slow the country’s move towards the use of 100 percent renewable energy by 2025.
How much risk would Guyana have to assume should their Liza Phase 1 development project become unprofitable and abandoned? Our global capitalist economic system thrives on indebtedness. ExxonMobil is in this marriage to win. We can be sure that their prenuptial agreement was drawn up in their favor.
Hopefully, you’ll get new roads, schools, railways and so on out of all this wealth. Do not waste it on the army!
LikeLike
I agree, John. Since the draft SWF is not yet available for public viewing, it’s not clear how this new wealth will be used. In June, the Finance Minister said that oil revenues will be used to invest heavily in core traditional sectors to reduce full dependence on oil to sustain the economy. This suggests that more money would be funneled into the already highly subsidized sugar industry. At a meeting with the manufacturing sector, he also said that the diversification of the economy is of paramount importance to avoid squandering oil revenues.
LikeLike
Even if the partners are unequal, the third “silent partner,” the people of Guyana get no vote and certainly much less benefit than the two signatories to the agreement. My goodness, how bad must the details of the Profit Sharing Agreement be if they won’t show it? This, of course, has a familiar ring, doesn’t it? Financial records hidden. Thanks for the report, Rosaliene.
LikeLike
Dr. Stein thanks for your comments. The Guyanese people are very wary of this lack of transparency and many among the working poor don’t believe that all this wealth will change their lives.The PSA was negotiated by the former corrupt government that still retains great influence over the majority Indo-Guyanese population. Tragically, corruption in Guyana is still pervasive.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Guyanese Online.
LikeLike
Cyril, thanks for sharing my post with your readers. Have a great week 🙂
LikeLike
Pingback: Guyana ties the knot with ExxonMobil – By Rrosaliene Bacchus
Thanks for sharing my post with your readers. Much appreciated 🙂
LikeLike
Reblogged this on The Secular Jurist and commented:
Highly recommended reading – a real world example of the allure of money and the risks of corporatism.
LikeLike
Thanks for the reblog, Robert. While I know that the current coalition government is taking all the necessary steps to invest its future oil and gas revenues for the benefit of the Guyanese people, I fear that the corrupt elements in the government and business community will siphon off as much as they can for themselves.
Guyanese blogger, Mark Jacobs, sums up his own disaffection: “Unless you [people of Guyana] plan on drinking petroleum, channel your energies in creating and producing or you will perish after the dream is over.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said, and you’re welcome. 🙂
LikeLike
Rosaliene,
Yet another excellent blog. Foreign investment is murder on less developed countries that are unfortunate enough to have natural resources. Starry-eyed local government officials get blinded and seduced by these huge power brokers, not realizing they are being used to betray local people. Didn’t anyone learn anything from Venezuela?
I’m glad you mentioned indebtedness as a risk. Is the Guyana government selling bonds to help this deal along? How much did announcement of the deal increase ExxonMobil’s stock prices?
You might like a new find of mine, a periodical, “Earth Island Journal.” It shows how foreign investors are operating around the world to ravage the environment and hook locals into virtual slave labor. I’m currently working on a blog summarizing the article, “Crisis among the Palms,” in its Summer, 2017 issue.
LikeLike
Thanks, Katharine. Your questions also push me to delve deeper.
“Didn’t anyone learn anything from Venezuela?”
~ In setting up its Sovereign Wealth Fund, the Guyana government seeks to avoid the pitfall of dependence on oil revenues. When oil prices fall, a country dependent on oil, as in the case of Venezuela and Trinidad & Tobago (also a member of the Caribbean Community), becomes crippled for cash to fund its development programs.
~ With regard to Venezuela, my fear is of a different nature. To me it’s a warning: Beware of attempting to nationalize your oil & gas industry at some future time or we will bring you down. Does the Guyana-ExxonMobil PSA have a clause regarding such a possibility? It’s impossible to know without full disclosure of the PSA.
“I’m glad you mentioned indebtedness as a risk. Is the Guyana government selling bonds to help this deal along? How much did announcement of the deal increase ExxonMobil’s stock prices?”
~ I haven’t read anything about selling bonds.
~ ExxonMobil’s stock prices reveal no significant increases at the time of the signing of its PSA nor the discovery of the oil deposits in May 2015.
Thanks for recommending the periodical, Earth Island Journal. I’ve signed up for their twice-monthly E-newsletter. I look forward to reading your article.
~ The transnational corporations are sucking us dry. Unfettered capitalism is the most virulent form of cancer to have infected all lifeforms on our planet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rosaliene, A very complex issue (or set of issues) indeed. I’m so glad you’re committed to staying on top of it. I hope and believe Guyana can win (or at least survive) in this deal, perhaps, if it stays out of debt. However, off-shore oil drilling scares me, and if it’s in disputed territory, it sounds like bad news for both Guyana and Venezuela.
LikeLike
As I see it, Katharine, Guyana and Venezuela are both pawns in this game.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I see it that way, too, unfortunately. ExxonMobil wins even bigger if it can keep the two countries at odds with each other. If Guyana can demand the same deal for Venezuela that it has accepted for itself, ExxonMobil might have more respect.
Anyway, like you, I predict the global demand for oil is going down and will continue do do so. That may be why the oil companies are so desperate to extract it before people wise up.
LikeLike
After investing billions of dollars, the fossil fuel giants are intent on collecting their profits.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But of course. They have dividends to pay, and I suspect they make more profit from stock transactions (and government subsidies, of course) than product sales
LikeLike
wow.
LikeLike
Thanks for dropping by, Kathy 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Realities dictate a sense of foreboding with this “marriage of unequal partners.” Corporate power is hideously out-of-bounds. Causing untold suffering of people and the ruin of the planet, these global corporations should be internationally prosecuted and convicted instead of creating new profit schemes.
LikeLike
Our tragic reality, JoAnn. It was not enough that they were pulling the strings backstage; now their former CEOs are embedded in our government.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A nightmare.
LikeLike
I respect the Carter Center and hope for more open information and transparency.
The monies may help the population for which I sincerely hope the children, elderly and disabled come first. Thanks, Rosaliene.
LikeLike
To keep our governments honest, we the people have to be vigilant and demand accountability.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes and this is important! 🌟
LikeLike
I have a very bad feeling about this. Of course, the parasites at Exxon-Mobil cannot be trusted on any level. No need to go into details as so many readers have left comments pointing out the pitfalls of doing business with the fossil fuel industry. Hopefully they don’t fan the flames of hate over the border dispute and incite war-like behavior between the two nations. And good luck hitting the goals set for renewables. 😦
Great article and very important. Hopefully, the people of Guyana won’t accept these shady dealings at face value.
LikeLike
I share your uneasiness. Right now, the Venezuelan government is distracted with civil unrest. The future has yet to unfold.
LikeLike
Let’s hope greed is set aside and cooler heads with a more long-term view prevail.
LikeLike
Let’s hope so.
LikeLike
These are subjects that rarely go well between my Mom and I. She is a retiree (1995) of Mobil Oil Corportation of 25+ years, before the merger. She comes from that generation (Cold War Era) of what she and her peers label “America’s Golden Years” when it was becoming and became the economic mammoth of the world due to ‘a hardened solid profitable American work-ethic.’ My stance is and always has been… there is nothing wrong with moving to Earth-friendlier renewable sources of energy so that my children and grandchilder actually HAVE a planet to live on. Period.
Ugh, but many of us know exactly what we’re up against and fighting. 🤑🤑🤑
LikeLike
Thanks for dropping by, Professor. “America’s Golden Years” have brought us to our present reality. All the stuff we dumped, and continue to dump, into our atmosphere, oceans, rivers, and lakes has had repercussions. It’s now the time of reckoning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vehemently agree Rosaliene. I just hope for the sake of my children, grandchildren & all their children that it isn’t too late. Sadly, when billions-trillions of dollars are at stake, it usually takes catastrophic (extinction?) events to wake up the apathetic, wealthy obese. 😦
LikeLike
Now, more than ever, we have to care for each other and for Mother Earth ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rosaliene, been reminded recently of this incredibly rhythmic beautiful song by Oceanlab given the USA’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and America’s complacency or apathy about the health/sickness of our one and only Pale Blue Dot and the redirection of American businesses. Think this song is still appropriate after a decade… 😦
LikeLike
We’ve been dragging our feet for a long time 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
This news saddens me, as the predators will continue to search for unsuspecting and sometimes gullible prey — especially where the lure of money has a strong voice. This strong thread of comments, however, is encouraging. Your post has people talking, exchanging ideas, and that is so important to showing unity – the David vs Goliath.
LikeLike
Thanks for dropping by, Lisa. To defeat Goliath, we the people have to come together to demand accountability.
LikeLike
hmm this concerns me. I wish there was more transparency.
LikeLike
So do I. And the Guyanese people. Thanks for dropping by.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t like the look of this agreement. While it may be a win-win situation, it seems that one of the parties is going to win a lot more than the other!
LikeLike
Agree, Denzil. Time will reveal how much is at stake for the Guyanese people.
LikeLike