Tags
Alliance of World Scientists, American Institute of Biological Sciences (BioScience), Changes in global human activities (1979-2019), Climate emergency, Climatic response to global human activities (1979-2019), Critical steps to reduce worst effects of climate change, World Scientists’ Warning of Climate Emergency (Nov/2019)
Cartoon: We are Destroying Earth
Photo Credit: Union of Concerned Scientists/Justin Bilicki
On November 5, 2019 more than 11,000 scientists from 153 countries signed a declaration, published in the journal of the American Institute of Biological Sciences, that states “clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency.” Though scientists began alerting world leaders forty years ago about global warming, greenhouse gas emissions continue to soar.
In an effort to expand our understanding of the climate emergency, the scientists have prepared several graphics of the vital signs of climate change over the last forty years.
The climate crisis is closely linked to excessive consumption of the wealthy lifestyle.
The 15 charts in Figure 1 depict the changes in global human activities from 1979 to the present:
01. Human population
02. Total fertility rate
03. Ruminant livestock (cattle)
04. Per capita meat production
05. World GDP (Gross Domestic Product)
06. Global tree cover loss
07. Brazilian Amazon Forest loss
08. Energy consumption (oil, coal, gas, solar/wind)
09. Air transport (by number of passengers)
10. Total institutional fossil fuel assets divested
11. CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions
12. Per capita CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions
13. Greenhouse gas emissions covered by carbon pricing
14. Carbon price
15. Fossil fuel subsidies
The 14 charts in Figure 2 depict the climatic response time series for the same period, 1979 to the present:
01. Carbon dioxide in atmosphere
02. Methane in atmosphere
03. Nitrous oxide in atmosphere
04. Surface temperature change
05. Minimum Arctic sea ice
06. Greenland ice mass change
07. Antarctica ice mass change
08. Glacial thickness change
09. Ocean heat content change
10. Ocean acidity
11. Sea level change
12. Area burned in the United States
13. Extreme weather/climate/hydro events
14. Annual losses due to weather/climate/hydro events
The climate crisis has arrived and is accelerating faster than most scientists expected. It is more severe than anticipated, threatening natural ecosystems and the fate of humanity.
The scientists stress the need for bold and drastic transformations to our economy and population growth. Among the actions needed, they highlight six critical and interrelated steps that world governments, businesses, and the rest of humanity can take to reduce the worst effects of climate change.
Energy
-
- Replace fossil fuels with low-carbon renewables and other cleaner sources;
- Leave remaining stocks of fossil fuels in the ground;
- Eliminate subsidies for fossil fuels;
- Wealthier countries to support poorer nations to transition away from fossil fuels.
Short-lived Pollutants
-
- Reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants: methane, black carbon (soot), and hydrofluorocarbons.
Nature
-
- Protect and restore Earth’s ecosystems;
- Restoration of nature’s atmospheric carbon absorbers: phytoplankton, coral reefs, forests, savannas, grasslands, wetlands, peatlands, soils, mangroves, and sea grasses;
- Nature’s partners in the carbon and nutrient cycle and storage: marine and terrestrial plants, animals, and microorganisms;
- Curtail loss of habitats and biodiversity.
Food
-
- Reduce global consumption of animal products, especially livestock that release methane;
- Eat mostly plant-based foods;
- Reduce the enormous amount of global food waste.
Economy
-
- Curtail excessive extraction of materials and over-exploitation of ecosystems, driven by economic growth;
- Shift from GDP growth and the pursuit of affluence towards sustaining ecosystems;
- Prioritize improving basic human needs and reducing inequality.
Population
-
- Stabilize global human population growth to ensure social integrity;
- Make family-planning services available to all people; remove barriers to their access;
- Achieve full gender equality through primary and secondary education as a global norm for all, especially girls and young women.
The Alliance of World Scientists are ready to work with decision-makers for a just transition to a sustainable and equitable future. They believe that, armed with the charts of the vital signs of climate change, we—policymakers, private sector, and the public—can better understand the magnitude of our climate crisis. With their widespread use, we can track our progress and realign our priorities for alleviating climate change.
You can read the full five-page declaration with charts at Journal BioScience.
We all know what the problem is, of course. The people with the brains are not the people with the power and the constant lust for even more and more power.
LikeLiked by 5 people
The people running the show have become devoid of compassion. Some actually have intelligence but lack wisdom.
LikeLiked by 3 people
That’s so true
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly, John. Greed and reason appear to be incompatible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Frightening
LikeLiked by 5 people
Fear mongering …but real !
For our generation
“Too little too late”
For next generation
“Wake up call”
For future generations
Too late ??
We can but speculate
Statistics are a useful tool in
convincing decision makers…but with
all available stats even weather forecasters
get it wrong.
Am forever optimistic
Kamtan
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kamtan, the evidence presented by our world scientists is not speculation. The only thing they’ve admitted to getting wrong is the speed and severity of climatic changes. Advancements in medical science save lives. Why is climate and related science treated with such circumspection?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Simple Simon says
The time scale !
Lifetime max 100+ years
Climate change longer.
Kamtan
LikeLike
Derrick, I don’t believe that the intention of our world scientists is to manipulate us with fearmongering. What they present in their declaration is data meticulously collected over the last forty years to substantiate their alarming claims. Emotions play no part in the scientific process.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, but frightening truths.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Scientists are not robots !
They are emotional humans with
hidden agendas corporate manipulated
biases. He who pay piper calls tune.
Science is corporate funddd.
Go figure !
Kamtan
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for sharing!!.. the world has the knowledge and possible answers to deal with change, the major hurdle is to convince those self- centered individuals with closed minded ideologies (either economic or faith based) to accept reality and do something to deal with it… 🙂
“The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom”. Isaac Asimov
LikeLiked by 4 people
Dutch, indeed, it is a major hurdle to get closed minded individuals to accept the reality that has not yet personally affected them. Unfortunately, time is running out for us to achieve a consensus to take action with the urgency required.
LikeLike
Well, I do not know how much more time I have in this mortal world but time is slowly running out for me no matter the changes in the universe.. 🙂 therefore, while I do not totally ignore the negatives, I concentrate on the positives and I’ll go to my grave knowing I tried… 🙂
“I expect to pass through this world but once; any good thing therefore that I can do, or any kindness that I can show to any fellow creature, let me do it now; let me not defer or neglect it, for I shall not pass this way again.”
Ettiene De Grellet
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent post Rosaliene. But so frustrating that these strong messages are not in general resonating with the key decision makers
LikeLiked by 5 people
Thanks, Denzil. It’s not resonating with the key decision makers for the simple reason that taking action would not be in their interests. I believe that their delusional sense of grandeur leads them to believe that they can control whatever nature throws at them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A few years I remarked to my eldest son, jokingly “can you imagine a world with Trump and Johnson as premiers of the USA and UK!” Never going to happen, he replied, that would be an utter disaster for the western world. Please tell me it’s just a nightmare and one day I’ll wake up and these two countries are governed by normal, respectable people who don’t lie and deceive!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Denzil, the lies go far beyond Trump and Johnson. Check out the following article:
“The Greatest Scam in History: How the Energy Companies Took Us All” by Naomi Oreskes, published in TomDispatch, November 10, 2019
LikeLike
Thanks for this Rosaliene, I’m going to check it out.
LikeLike
You’re welcome, Denzil 🙂
LikeLike
And no one cares😔
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s what so disconcerting, Laleh. We adults are failing our children and grandchildren. I look at the beautiful kids in the apartment complex where I live and wonder if their parents are considering the skills they would need to survive in a future world much different than our own.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know, it’s completely out of control.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Inexplicably, I’m unable to like the post or comments. I hope the comment is posted.
This is so necessary, such an important post.
“The climate crisis has arrived and is accelerating faster than most scientists expected. It is more severe than anticipated, threatening natural ecosystems and the fate of humanity.“
How can this one sentence not motivate people to do something about an existential threat facing the planet? The combination of the blind greed of corporate executives and the ignorant apathy of a terrified population who blindly accept whatever justifies their selfish lifestyle is destroying life as we know it. Life will continue, of course, but it will be very different than what currently exists.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Shift, I consider the “like” button as meaning “read and understood.”
Yes, that statement from our more than 11,000 world scientists is alarming and should, indeed, motivate us to action. However, since the Mainstream Media, including Fox News, has been silent on our unfolding climate emergency, I’m not sure how many people have access to this information.
Life will continue on Planet Earth, but, like the dinosaurs that once ruled the Earth, I doubt that the human species would be among them.
LikeLike
Spot on, Rosaliene.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for reading, Dr. Stein. Credit must go to our world scientists.
LikeLike
We all need to rise, educate and talk loudly about these matters. Changing policies is one of the most important actions which will change the way people live hopefully. Also, people need to make peace with nature and connect with nature deeply. They need to realise we are one and not superior to nature. Thanks for sharing very informative post, i will share it with my friends.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m with you, Sara. We’ve got to get more people engaged. Thanks for sharing with your friends 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Rosaliene,
Thank you for continuing this discussion. I think for many of us, the question is where do we go from here as individuals in our respective communities. How can we make a positive difference in the current status quo?
From my point of view, the major structural changes needed world-wide cannot happen without committed leadership from the USA, the country responsible for pumping the most greenhouse gases into the earth’s atmosphere. It is absolutely the responsibility of the financially privileged (who have contributed most to the crisis) to make the first and biggest sacrifices.
There was some momentum (though still too little too late) in the right direction back in 2015 when the Climate Accords were signed in Paris. Since the Trump era and Brexit took over our 24-hour news cycles, talk of climate change has been overshadowed by intentional melodrama orchestrated by various governments (from the USA to Brazil and far beyond) to keep the masses confused. The seeds of distrust (of the media and the very essence of scientific knowledge itself) that were sewn have grown into seemingly impenetrable walls between groups of people who should be working together to find solutions.
My initial hope was that educating people on this critical topic would turn the tide of public opinion, but I no longer believe that. It’s difficult to say this, but I don’t see the average American (and I’m generalizing here which is always dangerous) giving up their wasteful lifestyles willingly. Their attention spans are far too short and they have been programmed to avoid seeing the unpleasant truths that exist all around them.
So where does that leave us? Should those of us who trust the science turn into climate Nazis and find ways to force people to accept the radical changes needed to avoid the worst effects of global climate chaos? Extinction Rebellion is aiming for such a direction. Should we join them or do we continue in our efforts to educate the skeptics and wake those who refuse to accept the facts? These are important questions that must be answered.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Henry, thanks for sharing your thoughts on this pressing issue. Trump, Brexit, as well as Bolsonaro in Brazil, have set us back in ways that will have dire consequences in preventing the worst case scenario predicted by our world scientists. We’ve already passed the irreversible climate tipping point of our melting ice caps and glaciers. The Amazon Rainforest, a crucial carbon absorber, now stands in the balance for total collapse if we fail to end the burning. Our rapidly warming oceans also face an irreversible tipping point. With so many interrelated variables–atmospheric, marine, and terrestrial–at play, our ecosystems, society, and economies could collapse much sooner than predicted.
Fear not, the average American is already facing dire economic hardships, thanks to our nation’s astronomical inequality made even worse for our current administration. Here in Los Angeles, the homeless population occupying our streets is reminiscent of my days living in Fortaleza, Brazil. In Los Angeles County, we have 59,000 homeless people. Across the state, the number has now surpassed 150,000 people.
“So where does this leave us?” Under our current corporate American administration, I see no hope for urgent action in addressing our global existential crisis. In the coming presidential election, we the people need to take the giant leap of electing a president–male or female, young or old–who will prioritize this issue.
Meanwhile, we as individuals must transition to a vegetarian diet, reduce our consumption to essentials only, and stop having children, among other actions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Really !
You cannot be serious !
Kamtan
LikeLike
Kamtan, if you’re referring to my final comments, I am very serious. They are all mentioned in the six critical and interrelated transition steps set out by the world scientists in their declaration of our climate emergency.
LikeLike
Scientists do occasionally get it wrong.
Also weather forecasters.
Similar science.
Who funds scientific research ?
Go figure !
Kamtan
LikeLike
I think, Kamtan, that even without a few scientists belatedly waving the SOS signal flags on climate change, that almost anyone in the world today can either observe personally or become aware that something untoward is happening. I’m with you in having little regard for scientists and their science. 11,000 out of millions still solidly tied to the money belts of corporate and government corruption is not something I get excited about. There are two opposing arguments about the cause of anthropological climate change. One: it’s “we the people” who are to blame for using too much fossil type fuels. Two: it’s the elites for having developed a model of existence almost exclusively dependent upon the use of fossil fuels. That’s convenient, the old left versus right. If I want to justify my lifestyle, I blame the elites for my “helplessness” as some are urging. If they want to justify themselves, they blame us as the end users of their “product” claiming that if we really cared we wouldn’t buy their stuff. Who’s right, who’s wrong, and who are the dead in the end? I think that we need to engage the problem of climate while recognizing that some problems are man-made, hence within our purview while others are likely caused by perturbations in our greater solar system. If we act upon our part, we may soften the blow but if we do nothing, letting both feed upon each other, that doesn’t bode well for the future of Earth. So, do we play the blame game or are we forced into becoming climate nazis? Is there a middle road option? Would simplifying our individual lives, consuming less, driving and flying less, buying less, taking up less “space” turn the tide? From my point of view, people will change when they are absolutely forced to, never before, never voluntarily, exceptions noted. “Crapitalism” (as I call it) is not going gently into its goodnight either. So, I think we’re going to see much worse before we see any improvement, if such is even possible at this stage. I’m not negating your comment but I do not share your optimism that “there’s nothing happening here.” There, that’s my ramble on the article, and your comment!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good points made and taken aboard.
The understatement
Thing will get worse
Before they get better.
Pessimism or optimism !
Or both.
Change we must
As die we will
The only certainty in life …
Love the life I live
Live the life I love
Saludos
Kamtan
LikeLiked by 2 people
You know I am firmly in your camp Rosaliene. In fact, our tents are sitting side by side.
As for other comments about not trusting science: I’d say that the average scientist’s most prized possession is their reputation. That means being true to the findings of others or doing one’s own research in an effort to disprove a colleague’s theory. Whether anthropogenic climate change is supported by 80% or 97% of climate scientists (the kind of points that some argue over) is irrelevant to me. I choose to trust the words of 80% of climate experts over those of authoritarian leaders and corporate executives any day, the ones with a clearly self-serving agenda.
These ideas aren’t new; climate scientists have been warning us about the sharp rise in human-produced emissions and resulting global warming (with negative impacts) for 40 years. The new part is how much more rapidly these negative environmental changes are happening than originally thought, just as you’ve noted in your post, Rosaliene. The signs are everywhere if one only opens their eyes, but they are especially clear to those of us who daily witness what’s taking place in the developing world where the effects of drought, overpopulation and civil unrest are making life unbearable for many families. And we can see that it’s the poorest and most vulnerable who are paying and will continue to pay the highest price for the lifestyles enjoyed in richer countries. It’s also clear why there’s opposition to the facts. I’ll give Al Gore credit for the clever title of his 2006 documentary “An Inconvenient Truth”. The facts don’t always fit neatly into our preferred world-view.
I don’t see this as a difference of opinion as some have offered. Mitigating the effects of climate change aren’t some left-wing policy proposals. In this case, I think it’s clear where the majority of credible evidence points, no ifs, ands or buts.
The only real question left is how to join together to mitigate the effects.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nice one …
Who is gonna bell the cat !
Kamtan
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very very true – as if we needed further proof…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Rosaliene,
Granted that the wish list above is common sense, the question becomes one of how to move toward it. Where will the “leaders” come from? Governments can’t be relied on, since in many cases they are subsidizing the problem. Certainly the corporations won’t take the lead, unless they can profit by it. Unlike Sha’Tara, above, I believe there’s another way for people to change, and that is if they think the change is “trendy” or “fashionable.” For instance, I shop with handmade reusable shopping bags, made out of cotton canvas, a natural fiber. What if some fancy-dancy fashion designer started a line of signature re-usable shopping bags? This is just one token effort, but it gets people thinking in the right direction.
As you know, I’m more worried about environmental toxin accumulation, at least in the short term. The poisons we are dumping into the environment, as a result of industrialization, far surpass the measly influence of carbon dioxide and methane, which are both part of the life cycle. Plastic, on the other hand, is not. I just looked up some facts about plastic. It is the third largest manufacturing industry in the US, and fully one-third of plastics goes into packaging. Has anyone else noticed the gradual increase of packaging-to-product ratios in the food industry? I told a Kroger staffer the other day that I don’t buy coffee at Kroger anymore, because they no longer sell the blocks of freeze dried stuff. Also my large sizes of everything from butter and cheese to ice cream come in smaller packages, as the prices go up.
Long response, but I continue to think of small practical ways individuals can help make a difference.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Katharine, thanks for sharing your thoughts. We have so many pressing environmental issues to deal with, including environmental toxin accumulation and plastic waste, that it becomes mind-boggling to determine what to do to make a difference.
Earlier today, I read the following article that throws some light on how we got here:
“The Greatest Scam in History: How the Energy Companies Took Us All” by Naomi Oreskes, published in TomDispatch, November 10, 2019
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m going over to read about the scam but I’m quite certain I am already well versed in all the point made in the article.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is not only alarming, but downright frightening to see what is happening BECAUSE OF THE GREED OF THE WEALTHY CLASS. Will my Grands and Great Grands be able to survive. I was born in British Guiana (now Guyana) and when I lived there what I saw in Pics happening to the coast is frightening, Waves rolling over the sea defenses which never happened before across the entire coast.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hubert, thanks for dropping by and sharing your concern. What’s happening along Guyana’s coastline has become more frequent during high tides.
LikeLike
I think the most difficult part about getting people to accept the reality of climate change is that the problem is far too overwhelming to solve at the individual level. The fact remains is that we already have the technological means to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2030 (to limit warming to 1.5 degrees C). It’s just that most of our political leaders are in the pockets of the fossil fuel companies. This means that the people themselves are going to have to band together to make it happen.
Our local group will be showing this documentary from Zero Carbon UK on Dec 1, and it outlines very clearly what we need to do. They talk about reaching net zero emissions by 2040, which is confusing. That’s the deadline for limiting warming to 2 degrees C. That will probably save civilization but result in 3 million deaths in the Pacific islands and low lying coastal cities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dr. Bramhall, our climate crisis is, indeed, so overwhelming that we, as individuals, find it easier to deny it’s severity and emergency rather than accept the reality and take action.
Thanks for sharing the video link. It was worth setting aside the 35:56 minutes to watch the British-based documentary. Here are some points raised that I believe are important to consider as we move forward:
1. We need a new economic theory for the 21st century to replace our current outdated one that serves only a few.
2. Poly-centric governance is needed to involve all of society.
3. Quotation by Buckminster Fuller, shared by one of the experts: “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
4. Everyone needs to be involved. That includes you and me.
LikeLike
People need to get over their perceived need for rulers. They need organizers, not rulers. The responsibility for organizing has to be delegated to all, as was done somewhat successfully in England during the blitz. England was a besieged island. If people could see how earth is equally a besieged planet and the invaders are their leaders and rulers, perhaps you could summon the will to fight back. But it isn’t going to happen with texts and tweets. We know all about manufactured consent – how do you manufacture will?
LikeLiked by 2 people
This is certainly clear. Thank you for continuing to tell this truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
JoAnna, I’m glad that you appreciate what I do in raising awareness of my climate emergency ❤
LikeLiked by 1 person
❤
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing this blog – we all need to take steps to save our planet ! Gratitude !
LikeLike
You’d think business interests, particularly along the coasts, would be more concerned! What’s wrong w/people?!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Consider the amount of propaganda drugging they have sustained. Now all they can do is believe, follow, trust that those in power, be they religious charlatans, bureaucrats, appointed execs or business tycoons and bankers know best. If they say, business as usual, then that’s it. Nothing to worry about.
LikeLiked by 1 person
BroadBlogs, only the gods know what’s gone terribly wrong with their creation.
LikeLike
Pingback: World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency – by Rosaliene Bacchus | Guyanese Online
thank you for this compassionate nudging!
seems the writing has been on the wall
for a long time.
may transitions be peaceful 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
David, I also hope that the transitions would be peaceful 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing this. It’s sad how people need proof to get it. Simple and happening truth to before our eyes, only we are too blind or lazy(?).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pallavi, I’m reminded of the faithful wife who–despite all the mounting evidence of her husband’s infidelity–fiercely defends him against her best friend’s accusations of his extramarital encounters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was talking to a climate change disbeliever the other day. I would show him this post if I thought it would change his mind, but unfortunately Fox News or Rush Limbaugh made it up for him long ago.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MP, thanks for dropping by. I know the feeling: I live with one. My son wasn’t a climate change denier until he fell under the influence of some guy he follows on YouTube.
LikeLike
What about food wastage? If we consider it as a country, it is the third largest carbon dioxide emitter after China and the United States.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for dropping by, Ibrahim.
LikeLike