Tags
About Scrap Metal, Brazilian poet Manoel de Barros, Pantanal/Mato Grosso do Sul/Brazil, Teologia do Traste por Manoel de Barros, Theology of Junk by Manoel de Barros
Giant water lily, Victoria Amazonica – Pantanal – Mato Grosso do Sul – Center-West Brazil
Photo Credit: Andre Dib/WWF
My Poetry Corner February 2018 features the poem “Theology of Junk” (Teologia do Traste) by Brazilian poet, lawyer, and farmer Manoel de Barros (1916-2014). Born in Cuiába, Mato Grosso, he was a year old when his father decided to start a cattle ranch in Pantanal, the world’s largest wetland area, in Mato Grosso do Sul. The young Manoel grew up playing in the yard, between the pens and the “unimportant things” that would influence his poetry.
In “Manoel by Manoel,” he describes his childhood experience:
… I used to play pretending that stone
was lizard. That a can was a ship. That the sloth was a
little problematic creature and equal to a young grasshopper.
I grew up playing on the ground, among ants. Of a
childhood free and without comparisons. I had more
communion with things than with comparison.
When he moved to the city to go to school, Manoel found it a strange and complicated world. In the countryside, they had to make their own toys: small bone animals, sock balls, tin can cars. In “About Scrap Metal,” from his book Memories Invented for Children (2006), he observes:
I saw that everything that man makes becomes scrap metal: bicycle, plane, automobile. What doesn’t become scrap is only bird, tree, frog, stone. Even a spaceship becomes scrap metal. Now I think a white swamp heron is more beautiful than a spaceship. I beg your pardon for committing this truth.
Photo Credit: Premier Metal Buyers
In the featured poem, “Theology of Junk,” the poet reveals his childlike propensity of re-imagining the natural world and the use of discarded things.
Things thrown out as junk are treasures to me;
my favorites are cans.
Cans make poor words for people but they are concrete.
If you throw away a can, considering it junk: a beggar,
cook, or poet can pick it up and use it.
One person’s junk is a treasure to others left behind along the road of human progress. But, we respond differently when the discarded object is not concrete. Like ideas.
For that reason, I think cans are more satisfying, for
example, than ideas.
Because ideas, being objects conceived in the mind,
are abstract.
And if you throw away an abstract object as junk,
no one wants to pick it up.
Sardine-tin toy car made by a Brazilian boy
Photo Credit: Território do Bricar
When converted into a toy, worthless junk can delight a child. Not so with a discarded idea.
For that reason, I think cans are more satisfying.
We take a can, fill it with sand and leave, and
push through the streets a custom-made sand-truck.
An idea, being an abstract object conceived by the mind,
cannot be filled with sand.
What becomes junk today was once an idea made concrete. In the concluding verses, the poet notes that ideas not only illuminate our lives, they also lead to the development of destructive inventions.
For this reason, I think the can is more satisfying.
Ideas are the lights of the mind – we know that.
There are brilliant ideas – we know that too.
But ideas also invented the atomic bomb, the atomic
bomb, the bomb.
Now I would like that words would illuminate
that what we call junk would illuminate.
What does our junk and other discarded waste tell us about ourselves as a species? Where are our progressive inventive ideas taking our species along our evolutionary journey? How much stuff do we as individuals need to be satisfied?
To read the featured poem in its original Portuguese and learn more about the work of Manoel de Barros, go to my Poetry Corner February 2018.
Now there went a wise man! I am sorry not to have heard of his work before Rosaliene, I shall seek out more! Pauline
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pauline, he was a wise man, indeed! He’s one of Brazil’s most acclaimed contemporary poets. Sadly, the material available online is in Portuguese. The following site provides a good resource about his life and features several of his best poems:
http://www.elfikurten.com.br/2011/02/manoel-de-barros-natureza-e-sua-fonte.html
LikeLike
Thank you Rosaliene, I have had Google translate do its best and bookmarked that site. There is something really special about this man, it’s a shame he isn’t better known in the English speaking world. I was thinking about that tin can poem all night – there’s so much in it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same here. The more one ponders his words, the more they reveal their truth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is a great deal of sadness in this poem. It is hard to acknowledge the yin and the yang of ideas, their ability to create goodness and refuse at the same time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How insightful, Bernadette! “The Theology of Junk” is not numbered among his top ten best poems, but it’s the one that remained with me. We humans have yet to learn how to balance the positive and negative side effects of our creations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A poem for our materialist age. Thank you, Rosaliene.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And thanks for reading, Dr. Stein 🙂
LikeLike
So appropriate for reflection in today’s possession-obsessed society.
Manoel de Barros seems to have been a beautiful person.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He was indeed a beautiful person. I’m sorry that the 2008 documentary film about his life and work, shared on my Poetry Corner, is only available in Portuguese.
We humans have become so enthralled with our own creations that we have lost our connection with the awesome creative power of Mother Nature.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. Such arrogance and so sad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
a beautiful sentiment reflected in this poetic imagery, Rosaliene!
i remember junk of childhood being cans, bottles and metal
and doing some playing, although not as heartfully as Manoel de Barros .
garbage today is too vast, too plastic, less appealing and likely more toxic, in general.
i can somehow imagine small villages coping with the making & recycling
of garbage. but cannot fathom how societies with billions of people
will successfully resolve, or play with, this enormous heap of garbage 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
The water lilies are awesome, creating their own little eco-system while they float.
The toys we made as kids long ago, with grasses stuffed in rags for dolls, pieces of 2×4 and broom sticks cut ends for anything from cars to houses to animals, with a bit of pencil drawing and maybe some carving, old tires for forts, willow branches for bows and staffs when we entered our own ‘age of chivalry’; cans, jars, discarded aluminium utensils, all were eagerly collected to become a personal toy collection. They were more interesting and lasted longer than any modern toy after it’s pulled out of its plastic wrap or bubble pack.
I contend that man, generic, is unable, but for exceptions, to relate normally to his environment because he is not truly indigenous to this world. It’s a GMO creature that simply hasn’t had enough time to properly adapt to its environment. To man earth remains a prison from which he would escape if only he had the means and if he knew where to go. But there is no such place. Adapt or die is the only option but adaptation (evolution some call it) demands millions of years to make even small changes.
If we cannot adapt, and we’ve invented our technology so we would NOT have to adapt, then what shall we do once we’ve purged ourselves of this death-loving civilization and remain in pockets of survivors, a few hundred millions perhaps, essentially naked, helpless, hopeless in a landscape resembling Dante’s Inferno?
It is said that necessity is the mother of invention. Little of what is invented today comes from real necessity, but in that time, I wonder what we will invent?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sha’Tara, indigenous peoples worldwide continue to live in harmony with their natural environment. In my opinion, the GMO creature you describe is an aberration that afflicts those among us who see themselves above and outside of the natural world. The gods of our world.
LikeLike
Yes, realized fully. But for argument’s sake, just look at the trend, what has become the majority. Ask yourself: why the frenzy by the MIC to destroy all vestiges of indigenous lifestyles with the few left either as zoological rarities or specimens, or because the hammer hasn’t descended on them yet. Ask the tough questions, Rosaliene: WHY? Why the destruction, the inexorable oppression, the enslavement, the marginalization? Why does the growing majority “naturally” side with the destroyers? Just because a few of us can see doesn’t mean we are the norm. The norm is what makes the rules; what determines the outcome. The norm is what destroys, that is the norm.
To answer your comment fully I would literally have to write a book several hundreds of pages and then who would read it, since it would deny just about everything religion, science an economics pundits spew forth? Since it would expose the massive lie we are forced to live under? It wouldn’t change anything; only those who already know would nod, agree, and realize they don’t need to read the book. You and I, we’re the toilet paper lint clinging to the edge of the bowl watching the flushing taking place, helpless to stop it. That’s not despair speaking, that’s reality.
Civilization is like a genius painting a beautiful canvas. When more than half-way through he decided to let the characters in the painting take over and finish it. But they had no common platform, no goal, no intent, no common purpose. So they began to fight over space and colours. Some groups threw paint over other groups’ efforts until the canvas became covered in a slimy mess where hardly anything of the original remained recognizable. The main colour was no longer green and blue, but red.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sha’Tara, I look forward to reading your book if you do decide to write it.
LikeLike
David, our garbage today is so vast and toxic that it will one day consume us all.
LikeLike
A very profound perspective and questions. As a child, we didn’t have much money and were constantly moving from place to place. The very few store-bought toys I had were gifts from outside the family. My favorite playground were construction sites where I could gather scrap lumber, nails and other things that I could fashion into toys.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Robert, when we were kids the situation was much the same. Manufactured toys were not a priority on our parents’ household budget. Everything changes in an affluent society.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rosaliene,
I like the link between discarded cans and discarded ideas. I was thinking how de Barros’ childhood was so different from childhood now, because of the plastic. There’s not much romance in plastic junk. But a can or bottle or piece of wood has infinite potential.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s true, Katharine. But I’ve also read articles of people in small communities (in the developing world) who have found ways to use discarded plastic bottles, for example for constructing houses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rosaliene,
You’re right. I remember people used bubble plastic for makeshift greenhouses in Alamosa, Colorado.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The discarded things of today lack a tangible substance that reflects an era of disappearing sensuality. We have been creeping into an age of ‘techncold’ that will chill our souls and leave us with a superficial and tenuous shine destined to disintegrate and rob us of the beauty of rust.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mike, your comment is very poetic in its expression 🙂 Mass produced goods cannot have the “tangible substance” of handcrafted products of times past. Our so-called Smart phones, a permanent extension in the hands of our youth is, indeed, a ‘techncold’ means of communicating with each other.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We are sterilizing the planet to match our sterile lives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
At the same time, Shift, we are also contaminating Earth’s ecosystems in our quest for natural resources.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To answer your question, apparently, the attachment to stuff is endless. Apparently, it seems that we can never have too much, or want too much, or leave behind too much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kathy, that’s because we have been conditioned as consumers to feed our capitalist economic system’s drive to sell more and more to grow corporate profit margins.
LikeLike
We value everything and at the same time, we value nothing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true, Kathy 😦
LikeLike
Very sad commentary on the abominable way the first world treats the third world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Guyanese Online.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for sharing, Cyril 🙂
LikeLike
Pingback: “Theology of Junk” by Brazilian Poet Manoel de Barros
Thanks for sharing, GuyFrog 🙂
LikeLike
Lovely photo of the waterlilies, and intriguing exploration into how that people can reuse trash, although not in enough ways to truly recycle it all. So sad that we create far too much and so thoughtlessly–
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sad, indeed, Donnalee. Thanks for dropping by and sharing your thoughts 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
A wonderful post and I totally love the sardines tin toy car! You’ve given me much food for thought with Manoel’s poetry, Rosaliene – thank you! Sarah 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Sarah. Glad that you dropped by 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure! ☺
LikeLiked by 1 person