Tags
Corporate capitalist elite, Environmental Protection, Limits of global capitalist economic system, Scott Pruitt, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Headquarters of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Federal Triangle facilities – Washington DC – USA
Our global capitalist economic system has brought us to the edge of an abyss. If we want more jobs, the corporate capitalist elite tells us, we must reduce environmental regulations that increase their operational costs and make their products less competitive in the global marketplace. They say the same about financial regulations and employee wages. But those are other interrelated issues. I want to focus here on the environment.
The word “environment” seems to have lost its meaning for those of us, like myself, who live in large urban centers and have a greater say in state and federal policies, regulating our environmental protections. Far removed from our natural world, we can control the temperature within our homes, offices, and commercial and entertainment centers. We obtain our food and beverages, including purified bottled water, at our local farmers’ market, grocery store, or wholesale and retail supermarkets. The “environment” upon which our lives depend may seem distant and of little importance to urban dwellers.
Let’s gut the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the corporate capitalists or their puppets in government tell us. Let’s slash its workforce and budget. Its strangling the U.S. economy and impeding job growth. (What they really mean is that the EPA regulations hamper their growth and reduce their profits.)
We don’t need the EPA, the corporate capitalists tell us. We must trust them to do the right thing. We must trust them not to pump or dump their toxic waste into our atmosphere, lakes, rivers, oceans, landfills, and heaps of solid waste. We’ll have our jobs back, they promise. Based on their track record, our choice is either destitution (labeled and shunned as moochers) or a reduced lifespan combating some toxic-induced infirmity. Since we must die anyway, our choice is easy: jobs. (Forget about our moral responsibilities towards our kids and future generations.)
Established on December 2, 1970, by Republican President Richard Nixon, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not always live up to its mission of protecting human health and the environment. Corrupt corporations, corporate influence on state policies, and the shortage of personnel to investigate abuses and enforce regulations undermine its efficacy.
On February 2, our Senate Committee approved Scott Pruitt, a climate change denialist, as new head of the EPA. Should the corporate capitalists have their way, he will gut or abolish the EPA.
Let’s not be fooled. The choice between jobs (those that would pollute and destroy our environment) and the environment is an “alternative fact” created by our corporate capitalist elite. Without a healthy environment that sustains human life and other living beings upon which our lives depend, we would cease to exist as a species on Planet Earth. Surviving species would have no need for human jobs or money.
I keep thinking of what the spiritual greats of our time would tell us regarding all this. All I know is that if we collectively poison our environment, and we allow the wealthy to do as they please unchecked, we’ll have a more damaged planet that might threaten our own survival. Without the regulations, those 1%ers think that there are no consequences for their actions, but one day they, too, will look back and lament. I have a feeling – if we’re here 500 years from now – that we’ll look back at this day and age and think, “it was the Dark Ages when humanity turned its back on living in harmony with the planet.”
Eh…I’m normally quite optimistic, but I also feel the suffering of so many: climate refugees, the animals, the trees, and those who do not have a voice or a say in what happens.
But…I always have hope that we’ll come to our collective human senses. Maybe…perhaps. Sigh.
LikeLike
So true, Sageleaf, we are living in a new Dark Age. Will we come to our collective human senses in time to save ourselves from self-destruction? Based on the new administration’s picks for heading critical agencies and departments, I think not. It’s now up to we the people to turn the ship around.
Here’s a link I received today from the 350.org team on finding steady ground to strengthen our spirits to resist and thrive in these times:
http://www.findingsteadyground.com/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for that link! Already checking it out. Getting tired is a possibility and we have to take care of ourselves. That is what they’re counting on – for us to get tired and complacent. I tell you, I’ve never been so politically active as I am now, but I won’t/can’t get tired: all marginalized communities have had to fight continuously for hundreds of years. A lot of folks are waking up to that fact, too. Now is the time when we can overcome the shortcomings of our past and move toward the future in solidarity and confront those who would quelch progressive movements and values. So glad I’ve found your blog and sending you hugs! #resistance
LikeLike
Thanks for the much-needed hugs, Sageleaf.
With their vast wealth and legal brokers, those in power are masters at attacking us on all fronts to wear us down. Just watch our new leader in action. With a tweet, he can destroy a person’s life, reduce a company’s stock price, or put a nation on notice.
LikeLike
The EPA was far from perfect in following its mandate but this latest move indicates exactly where the elites are taking the world. Surprise? None from me. It’s the final gutting of a nation dying in its ignorance, greed and bigotry. What America has foisted on its neighbours and most of the rest of the planet this last century is now the proverbial chickens coming home to roost. The EPA after all was little more than a sop to an expendable middle class of liberal voters. Trump, having shown they are no longer an issue, can make America “grate” again as in the pre-labour union days, and Great Depression era. Anyone in blogger land wanting to re-write the great novel in
“The Grapes of Wrath” style won’t lack factual material to choose from in the coming years. Of course it won’t get published… and its author will probably have to go into hiding, or end up in a rehabilitation camp.
LikeLike
Sad to say, Sha’Tara, but you’re spot on. I think that the dying, corporate, capitalist elite is now forced to ravage their home base, their last standing citadel.
LikeLike
Dark days are upon us.
LikeLike
Indeed.
LikeLike
Dark days, indeed, Cindy. Judging from the beautiful Nature photos that you share with us, all is not yet lost.
LikeLike
Rosaliene,
You know I’m all for the environment, but I’m no fan of federal regulatory agencies. In my experience, they work more for the corporations than for the taxpayers. They target the little guys and look the other way when the corporations transgress. Then disaster happens, as in Savannah when the Imperial Sugar plant exploded a few years back. If OSHA had been doing its job of inspecting, the accident wouldn’t have occurred, but as it happened, Imperial Sugar stock went up the next day (insurance money?), OSHA rushed in and charged a huge fine, and our senator got lots of press with new laws increasing regulation and OSHA funding. Meanwhile, our state senator moved to exploit the crisis for funding for more trauma centers.
The agencies wouldn’t be necessary if the plants were smaller and waste management a part of the initial permit. I believe the industrial age has peaked, anyway, and future jobs will be in finding ways to make waste profitable, for instance. Waste-to-energy plants, as in Germany, which burn landfill for energy.
The focus on exports means the good stuff is sold abroad while the waste remains behind. Unfortunately, our president and too many Americans believe exports are good “for the economy.” The Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines are examples of this self-destructive thinking. Fracking, which is polluting groundwater faster than people can report on it. How contaminated is our groundwater already? No one wants to know.
In theory, the regulatory agencies protect regular people, but the EPA is in the business of granting permits for dumping into rivers, streams and aquifers for a fee. It sets limits, but how much is too much? It is arbitrary, and everyone else is doing it, too, and that stuff just builds up over time.
I believe the agencies give people a false sense of security. Taxpayers believe they are being protected so are less inclined to challenge industries in their own communities, even though they are the first to feel the effects.
LikeLike
Yes, the EPA has not served us as well as they should have for all the reasons you have cited. The powerful always find a way of corrupting the regulators we put in place. I don’t believe that eliminating our regulatory agencies will resolve our environmental issues. It means that we the people have to hold them accountable for their disastrous decisions at the local level, through our town hall meetings.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As often happens, your comment deserves a thoughtful response. I agree abolishing regulatory agencies is too simplistic. However, the EPA has enforcement sub-agencies in probably every state, Georgia for sure. Other federal agencies also have spin-offs individual states. Yes, those people need jobs, too, but how many regulatory agencies do we need? I agree more local involvement and control would help keep them accountable. They need to be reminded that the international corporations have no local loyalty.
LikeLike
Katharine, I share your view that “the international corporations have no local loyalty.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great post. Too many people fail to realize that there are NO jobs on a dead planet.
LikeLike
Thanks. It’s such a slow dying process, across several generations, that it’s difficult for our species, with short lifespans, to accept that Earth can one day become devoid of life like Mars.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, but it still must take an enormous effort of obstinate ignorance to deny the science of human-caused climate change as well as making observations for yourself. Very sad.
LikeLike
Very sad, indeed. Some future civilization, millions of years from now, will shake their heads at the folly of our “obstinate ignorance.”
LikeLike
http://www.ecowatch.com/whale-dead-plastic-bags-2242936742.html
This article shows what plastic waste is doing to wildlife in the oceans.
LikeLike
Thanks for sharing the link, Leslie. Our plastic waste continues to be detrimental to marine life.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Guyanese Online.
LikeLike
Thanks for sharing, Cyril. Have a sunshine week 🙂
LikeLike
truth!
may we stay peaceful
supporting each other
living simply,
buying and consuming
less 🙂
LikeLike
Thanks, David. Buying and consuming less is a great start for us. We in the so-called advanced economies produce far too much waste.
LikeLike
“A Writer from the East” blog (human rights advocate from Pakistan) wrote a comment on her blog: “We need to look at our problems holistically.” When one thinks about that, it’s a very powerful and meaningful word. Your comment reminded me, again, that indeed we must look at our problems holistically. Another way I learned the idea was from “Liberation Theology” movement which stated, “Think globally but act locally.” and “Live simply that others may simply live.” In simplifying my life (gave up the passport, no more travel, no more unnecessary driving, entertainment or shopping, that sort of thing) I learned to look at my own neighbourhood and see its problems and tackle that. Yet my mind is always at the global level, making me aware that in every one of us is the sacred seed that will (yes, I mean will, not may) change the whole world. We can make ourselves see that what we do locally does affect the entire world, though we may not see that. There’s great inner rejoicing in that and we learn to “transmute” the terrible things that haunt our thoughts and dreams so we never fall into despair. I read a good quote yesterday, from James Jones: “That was one of the virtues of being a pessimist: nothing was ever as bad as you thought it would be.” Not that we have to be pessimists necessarily, but he does make a good point. I was a pessimist once, now I think I’m a dystopian… my motto being “Expect the worst, you’ll never be disappointed.” But I am, all the time, happily so because the worst never happens!
LikeLike
Sha’Tara, thanks for sharing another perspective of the challenge we face. Being a geographer and international trade professional made it possible for me to view our world holistically and to see how all nations and its peoples are connected.
LikeLike
I agree with everything you’re saying, but the problem is that all the remedies are very radical and very big steps to take. I don’t like French beans enough to want them flown in to England from Kenya in the winter but a lot of people do. And they want them cheap so the Kenyan earns 10 cents an hour for picking them.
LikeLike
John, as SmileCalm notes, we can each begin with “living simply, buying and consuming less.” I know what you mean about French beans. I once worked in Brazil with a fresh melon exporter to Europe during its winter off-season.
We have been so slow in addressing climate change that we now need “very radical and very big steps” to slow down the upward warming trend of our planet. When climatic disasters descend upon us with more frequency and even greater force, there will be no turning back. Our lives will never be the same again.
LikeLike
Well put. Jobs vs. environment is pure propaganda. The renewable energy sector will create plenty of good jobs–when our legislators stop propping up fossil fuels kings. If we had a true free market, that industry would be about dead by now.
LikeLike
Agree. Our so-called (self-appointed) leaders make us slaves of a fake economy and fake monetary system that are destroying the planet.
LikeLike
Agree, JoAnn. Regrettably for all of us, the guardians of the old energy sources are holding on for the last drop.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true. I am worried about deregulation efforts as of late. Unrestrained capitalism, in my view, is unethical for the very reasons that you highlight. What’s so interesting to me is that it appears that throughout history primitive people have known the cost of greed all along. Great read!
LikeLike
Thanks, Belanger. Greed knows not its folly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That made me think, I remember that serious deregs went full steam under Reagan and affected/infected all other western style corporate “democracies” under the dollar driven banksterism. It’s been going full ahead and damn the torpedoes since. The A-Holes running this ship aren’t even aware that no amount of deregs is going to do any good now – there’s essentially nothing left, so dereg away: kill what’s left of any sanity in the global anthill. The environment as we know it will be damaged, sure, but something will survive, adapt, and re-establish itself after the plague has run its course. Common sense says it can’t be stopped now. The fever of gargantuan greed and global institutional corruption, aided and abetted by abysmal collective ignorance and apathy is rising to its peak point. This too shall pass and a new world will arise from the ashes of the current madness. Undoubtedly it will be unrecognizable. Civilization and its supporting technology will be destroyed but the real values of what constitutes humanity, now ignored, mocked and considered useless in man’s brave new scientific world will arise and guide the survivors into something many have been longing for a very long time. Life isn’t dependent upon the capriciousness or stupidity of man-made systems. I refuse to look at the consequences of a Trumped-up tempest in the proverbial teapot. Time for us to walk out of our Matrix-induced sleep and discover ourselves as we’re supposed to be. Anyone of us possesses more “power” than all systems put together.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seems like this issue should be win-win. There’s a way to be good stewards and employers. Peace!
LikeLike
Peace to you, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Had you read this: https://luckyottershaven.com/2017/01/29/its-worse-than-you-thought-please-share/
LikeLike
Thanks for sharing the link, Kathy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said, Rosaliene.
LikeLike
Thanks, Dr. Stein.
LikeLike
Such astute observations about the meaning of “environment” to people who live in urban areas, Rosaliene. Your discussion reminds me of an experience I had trying to use an assigned storybook about deer in the forest to tutor a young inner city girl in reading. When I asked her if she had ever seen a deer or visited a forest, she shook her head “no.” There’s a quote I often think of in these situations.
“In the end, we will conserve only what we love; we will love only what we understand and we will understand only what we are taught.” (Baba Dioum)
Eliminating safeguards, of course, is not about jobs as you point out, or even about money. It’s about power and control by truly joyless souls who want everyone else to be as empty and joyless as they are. Survival isn’t about making money, it’s about sharing the skills we have and the things we make and produce with each other in some means of fair exchange without expecting to get more than our fair share at others’ expense. We don’t need factories or overseers to do that. We just need to begin building respectful relationships with each other and our surroundings wherever we are.
LikeLike
Carol, thanks for sharing that quote from Baba Dioum. So true. It’s so important for us to expose our children to the natural world and the importance of its conservation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Jobs vs. Environment |
Thanks for sharing my post. Much appreciated 🙂
LikeLike